A Rant, or Damn the Man

I wanted to share a link that irked me a bit this morning and see if anyone else had any thoughts on the matter. It appears that Durham has decided to enforce the collection of a pet tax. While I am not currently a Durham resident, I may be within the next few months. Also, I do not have buddies who died face down in the muck for our rights to own pets, but I'm channeling Walter too: "This affects all of us, man! Our basic freedoms!"

Anyway, here are my problems with this idea, as it relates to our animals. We own two cats, both indoor-only and neutered. We paid the adoption fee for each animal and pay all other expenses (vet, food, etc.) out of pocket. Since the cats never step paw out of our house and onto county property and the county does not contribute to their upkeep, why should I pay taxes on my animals? What benefit am I getting from paying those taxes?

The dog tax makes a little more sense to me, but not much. Perhaps the argument is that the dog does go outside and may make use of county recreational facilities. This argument seems to fall in line with people who don't want to contribute to public education because they don't have children. My question on the dog portion of the tax is this: if I pay a dog tax, does give me free use of public dog facilities, such as dog parks? It seems unfair for the county to continue to collect a fee for park usage as well as charge a dog tax. Also, why should I have to pay an animal tax on top of property tax and HOA dues?

I understand that $30 a year is not much in the big grand scheme of things, but this strikes me as an unnecessary and unfair tax.